Scene 21 · Notes

Notes Scene 21: The Letters

Notes on this scene

Holmes establishes that there was no secret marriage or legal documentation. He questions how Adler could prove the letters genuine if she used them for blackmail or another purpose. The King points to his handwriting, but Holmes dismisses that argument by suggesting that the letters could be called forgeries.

Japanese in this scene

なさった
なさる is the honorific equivalent of する. なさった is its past form, used when asking about the King’s actions.
分わかりかねます
Verb stem + かねる politely expresses inability. 分かりかねます means “I cannot understand,” with a formal, restrained tone.
としても
としても introduces a hypothetical concession: “even if.” Holmes considers what would happen even if Adler produced the letters.

Background

Secret marriage
Royal marriages were also matters between states, and marriages to people of lower rank were difficult to recognize publicly. Holmes asks about a secret marriage and certificates to find out whether legally binding evidence exists against the King.

Full text: original English and Japanese translation

"Precisely so. But how—"

「まさにそのとおりだ。だが、どうして――」

"Was there a secret marriage?"

「秘密の結婚をなさったのですか」

"None."

「していない」

"No legal papers or certificates?"

「法的な書類や証明書の類いは?」

"None."

「ない」

"Then I fail to follow your Majesty. If this young person should produce her letters for blackmailing or other purposes, how is she to prove their authenticity?"

「それでしたら、陛下のおっしゃることが分かりかねます。この若い女性が、ゆすりやその他の目的で手紙を持ち出したとしても、それが本物だとどうやって証明するのでしょう」

"There is the writing."

「筆跡がある」

"Pooh, pooh! Forgery."

「ご冗談を。偽造ですよ」

Japanese words in this scene (with English meanings; ☆ saves a word)

  • 陛下(へいか) — Your Majesty; His or Her Majestyhard
  • 偽造(ぎぞう) — forgery; counterfeitinghard
  • まさに — exactly; precisely
  • なさる — Respectful equivalent of する: to do.
  • 法的(ほうてき) — legal; relating to law
  • 証明書(しょうめいしょ) — certificate; written proof
  • 類い(たぐい) — kind; sort; category
  • おっしゃる — to say (honorific)

Next scene: Any Proof?

The client offers his personal notepaper and his seal as proof that the letters are genuine. Holmes counters each argument with a brief reply. Eventually the client brings up evidence much harder to dismiss than the letters themselves, and the expression on the detective’s face changes as he hears it.